On a typical weekday morning, the pattern emerging from these reports points to an automated outreach operation that cycles through random numbers and drops a vague questionnaire about children’s media habits. Callers rarely leave a voicemail, often claim to be conducting a survey or political poll, and use fabricated caller IDs like “Corp4Character” or “QVD.” The best defense is to let the call go to voicemail, block the number, and enable any carrier‑provided spam‑filtering. If a live agent asks for personal details, hang up immediately. Consistently reporting the number to your phone carrier can also help curb repeat attempts.
During the converstaion i was asked if tv and video games have a negitive impact on childs, i agreed and the caller abruptley ended the call.
A call was received from this number, but due to the unclear message left, it was impossible to discern the caller's identity or intentions.
After several calls, I finally spoke with someone named Amanda who was looking for Jimmy; when I informed her that there was no Jimmy at this number, she insisted that she had the right number but the wrong name and proceeded to discuss parental control and ask me to virtually sign a petition by pressing 9, which I declined to do.
The call came at 7:45 pm, but they didnt leave a message.
At 2 pm, this number called to conduct a survey related to parental controls for TV, internet, and cell phones.
It appears to be a telemarketing autodialer, as the machine picked up and asked for Whitney.
A call was received at 9:23 a.m. cst, but no message was left, with the caller ID showing QVD.
At 8:46 am, a woman called, inquiring about Molly while my answering machine was engaged, and promptly hung up without leaving a message
A mysterious call was received from this number, with a woman stating, "just so you know this is a man", which was unclear and confusing.