Who would've guessed that a single credit‑repair number could flood inboxes? The flood of calls from the 602‑474‑2454 line is a textbook case of aggressive tele‑marketing masquerading as a legitimate credit‑repair service. Callers repeatedly claim you requested a free consultation, then push you to call back on a different number or an 800‑line to opt‑out. Block the offending numbers, but also add the caller to your carrier’s Do‑Not‑Call list and register with the FTC’s National Do Not Call Registry. Keep a log of timestamps and request written verification of any alleged debt. If the harassment continues, file a complaint with the FCC and consider a cease‑and‑desist letter via certified mail.
Opting out of robocalls from this number has proven to be impossible, with 2-3 calls received daily
Constantly, this number is involved in phishing and spam, using different numbers each time
A robocall from 804-292-7151 was not aware it was leaving a message on an answering machine
I strongly agree with the assessment that this number is problematic.
Some telemarketer called 4 times within 10 minute's
Numerous calls were made claiming to be return calls, but I've never contacted them; after blocking the number, I still receive messages daily, indicating they may be bypassing the block.
It appears that Lexington Law is perpetuating a harassing campaign against numerous individuals, contacting them from various numbers including (478) 225-0751 and providing alternative callback numbers.
It seems like a more tailored aproach would be better, instead of a generic advised, we should consieder the specifical situation at hand.
Given their lack of effort to block numbers, it's unlikely they would follow through on more formal actions like sending a certified letter.
Rather than relying solely on call blocking, it might be more effective to send a formal cease and desist letter via certified mail, and consider taking legal action if the unwanted calls persist.
Blocking this number is the best course of action, or even better, block the entire area code if you have no acquaintances there
The harassment from this number is relentless, with at least five calls daily, causing my mailbox to fill up and resulting in missed important appointments due to the inability to receive new messages.
Numerous daily calls from this number have become a nuisance, despite my request to be removed from their list, as I have no need for their services.
A call was received claiming a free credit consultation had been requested, which was not the case.
A robocall was received from this number promoting credit repair services, prompting advice to report such calls to the State Attorney's office and consider taking legal action for damages.
Apparently, i recieved alot of calls daily from various phone numbers with a NJ area code, they leave me a message with this number to call back, then if i dont want to recieve their calls no more, i gotta call 800-422-4895, whats the point of that?
Absolutely annoying experiance. They wont stop calling me, even tho i have them blocked, they still manage to leave voicemails on my phone.
I been gettin call from 518 203 1863, then they tell me to call 602 474 2454, sound like a scam
I also received a robocall from this number, which left a voicemail message claiming to be from Beth, a paralegal at Lexington Law Firm, regarding a supposed internet inquiry about credit repair options
I am inundated with at least 5 calls daily from this number, with a recorded message referencing a credit inquiry I never made, and after calling the number back to request removal from their list, the person who answered hung up on me.
Repeated calls from this number are puzzling since I don't know anyone in the 602 area code, so I'm choosing not to answer
Elijah poole keeps callin my job sayin i owe a loan, but i never took a online payday loan
Need to stop these peoples from calling me, its geting anoying
This number makes numerous calls.
This number has been contacting me as well, but I haven't replied - could it be a spam call?
A call was received from someone claiming to represent Lexington Law, but the area code discrepancy raised suspicions