Predictive ATDS delivery is a possibility, and the blocker page was updated with a new sound file featuring a male voice
Silent scam calls—how to stop them!
Summary — +18039630166
Expert Opinion
Imagine a silent ring from +18039630166 that never says a word and just hangs up. That pattern is a classic hallmark of a scam call, often used to snag a brief interaction before you block the number. The safest play is to let the call go to voicemail, then add the line to your carrier's Do‑Not‑Call (DNC) list and enable any built‑in call blocking features. If you’ve already answered, avoid providing personal details and end the call right away. Consider reporting the number to the FTC or a reputable spam‑call database so others can benefit from the warning. Consistently updating your block list keeps your phone line cleaner.
Caller Categories
Caller Names
Rate this number — +18039630166
Recent Reports for (803) 963-0166
Compliance with FTC regulations is supposedly achieved through a return phone number or keypad input during the inbound message, yet the true identity of the business remains concealed.
The situation is utterly ridiculous, warranting little more than disdain.
Due to this website's rules, the name associated with the number cannot be disclosed or even hinted at.
When you answer, there's no one there, but when you call back, they reveal their intention, i reported this to a service that intercept call from reported number
Having a generic 'robocaller' label is pointless when the transcript clearly shows it was a live person on the call
A online search reveald that this call origiates from the Columbia, South Carolina area, and it's a Robocaller operation that's been marked as 'severe' by the reporting organisation
Upon answering a call from this number, the phone immediately hung up after greeting the caller.
Despite answering the call multiple times, the caller consistently hangs up, prompting the decision to block the number.
A call was received on Memorial Day, but no message was left
Over the course of three calls, the first two yielded no response, while the third call involved a man claiming to represent an investment company interested in purchasing land.