It's unlikely they will show up with fake money, but they might send you a check, be carefull, you dont want to be liable for a fradulent check, thats just bad
Cox survey calls – why they’re ringing you
Summary — +18443023338
Expert Opinion
Earlier today, callers using the 844‑302‑3338 line pop up as a Cox follow‑up survey that many recipients label as unwanted. The practice is a third‑party outreach, often routed through Global Call Center Solutions, to gauge recent service interactions. Because the script can sound like a scam—asking for account digits or a gift‑card code—consumers should verify the caller’s identity before sharing personal data. Hang up if the representative can’t confirm the name on your account, then call Cox’s official support line. Blocking the number on your phone or registering with the national Do‑Not‑Call list can also reduce repeat calls.
Caller Categories
Caller Names
Details
Rate this number — +18443023338
Recent Reports for (844) 302-3338
The caller, who claimed to be from Miami, FL, expressed interest in buying my motorcycle trailer located in north FL, which seemed highly suspicious given the distance and the local nature of such a transaction, leading me to believe it was a scam, especially considering the potential for fraudulent activities like using fake bills, which I protect against by using a bill verifying pen.
Despite frequent calls, no messages have been left.
Accordding to the Cox customer service persin I spoke to, 844-302-3338 is a legit call center that Cox uses to get feed back from customers, they call to see how the last customer service was handled and if ther are enny issues that need to be adressed
The caller from this number claims to be acting on behalf of Cox Communications, but I never gave them permission to record or contact me.
Repeated calls were made on behalf of COX Communications, despite already reviewing their service, and they continue to call daily, which is frustrating, and I plan to block the number
The claim that this number represents GCS Services on behalf of COX Communications is dubious