This number is suspected to be from the United States
Nieznany dzwoniący: jak rozpoznać scam?
Podsumowanie — +001
Opinia eksperta
Zaskakująco, wiele zgłoszeń wskazuje na powtarzające się schematy oszustw telefonicznych, które wykorzystują presję czasową i groźby prawne. Najważniejsze jest identyfikowanie nieznanych numerów przed oddzwonieniem oraz blokowanie podejrzanych połączeń w ustawieniach telefonu lub za pomocą aplikacji antyspamowych. Warto zapisywać szczegóły rozmowy – numer, czas, treść – aby móc zgłosić incydent operatorowi i właściwym organom ochrony konsumentów. Nie podawaj danych osobowych ani finansowych, a w przypadku podejrzenia oszustwa skontaktuj się z bankiem lub firmą, której rzekomo ma dotyczyć sprawa, używając oficjalnych kanałów kontaktowych.
Kategorie dzwoniących
Najczęstsi dzwoniący
Oceń ten numer — +001
Najnowsze zgłoszenia dla 001
Received a call but they never spoke, and when I tried to call back the number didn't exist
Been recieving alot of calls from 00001 in the last week, dont know who it is and dont want to answer
The caller didnt even bother to anser, it seems like a scam to me
This number only rang for a brief moment, appears suspicious and is unverifiable
In agreement, dropping party affiliation some years ago has been beneficial, allowing a broader perspective without the constraints of a specific label.
Establishing a committee to investigate would be a good starting point, considering names like Lois Lerner, IRS, and Ben Ghazi, Ambassador, have been involved in similar matters.
Apparently, advancment of a theroy is not enought to sugest that goverment can be sued easly
Given their methods, it's understandable that debt collectors have a negative reputation.
Historically, collection agencies and government entities have rarely been held accountable for their actions, so it's unlikely this trend will change anytime soon.
It may be possible to hold these callers accountable as agents of the DOE, as they have the authority to enter into repayment agreements on behalf of the DOE.
It's hypocritical for job creators to complain about the lack of educated workers when the system in place often punishes those who try to join it.
Speculation suggests that the withheld material may reveal more about the commissions awarded to contractors by the DoE, including who receives the most benefits and the true funding sources; moreover, it's possible that the DoE is concealing the high costs associated with its 'asset recovery' efforts.
Debt collectors often employ aggressive tactics, creating more debt; companies like Mohela use disguises and third-party collection, exploiting debtors and their acquaintances
It's curious to consider what they might be attempting to conceal, Res.
The superb work done by the NCLC in advocating for consumer rights is evident in their recent report, which can be found in its entirety as a PDF.
The Act clearly defines covered entities, limiting vicarious liability, and it does not consider the DoE a debt collector; there should be alternative methods to challenge the DoE, which is part of the problem.
It is likely that they were aware of the situation, and their knowledge of it is almost certain
The question arises whether the Department of Education can be held liable for any FDCPA violations committed by debt collectors acting on their behalf.
Readers may find it interesting that Huffington Post has published an article about the education department using private debt collectors; here is the link to the piece.
CenturyLink has been notified about this number, which has called multiple times, but they advise not to answer and have offered no solution, similar to the annoying card services scams
This number contacted me yesterday, claiming to be Reliant Capitol, LLC, and attempted to sell me windows and doors.
I get daily calls from Security Screen, even on sundays, the ring tone sounds wierd, like 2 or 3 sets of rings, we blocked the number, but they keep calling back.
The information provided is both informative and alarming.
What a nuisance
You might have missd this story from NBC News yesterday evening, due to the bad weather:
I just recieved a call from this number, the voice sounded like a young girl, she said she was my granddaughter, but i didnt belive her
Apparently, this number is not legitimate, as the caller claimed I had hit their car, only to reveal it was a prank call from prankdial.com, and if I discover the perpetrator's identity, I will report them to their internet service provider and pursue legal action.
I received a one-ring call from a number with an international area code, which I did not answer or return.
I attempted to return the call, but Sprint services denied acces to this number 2687620130, which is an international number from Barbuda, thankfully Sprint services would not allow the acces.